[WikiEN-l] Neo-nazis to attack wikipedia- a diversion?

Wed Feb 9 07:32:46 UTC 2005

On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 02:46:54 +0000, rose.parks at att.net
<rose.parks at att.net> wrote:
>      Second, do you all really believe that if they intended to do exactly as they say, they would post their tactics openly on their site? I wonder! I think that they _do_ intend to do damage to Wikipedia, but the details are probably in private mailings among members of their community. Meanwhile, they could be using their postings as a _diversion_, and while everyone is concentrating on monitoring certain articles, they could do something entirely different to damage our site. I leave it to those more technically inclined to try to figure out what that might be….
>      Just my thinking….

Look at it this way:
1) They thought that removing an excessive amount of links from a page
(unprotected) was an "abuse of admin rights"
2) "Wikipedia is a pro-Zionist, anti-white racialist, conformist site"
3) "its clearly written by an unrepepentant red, spilling out all the
same old apologies for communism."
4) "Holocaust Denial has been essentially hijacked by the jews on
wikipedia, along with many other topics, we really need more white
people to sign up to wikipedia and help to make unbiased contributions
to wikipedia.com"
5) They still haven't figured out the site address is en.wikipedia.org.
6) Some important messages need to be repeated twice before being
noticed. http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showpost.php?p=1633290&postcount=39
7) They link to sources which have no sources
http://home.att.net/~whitesox/israel/Auschwitz.htm ->
http://www.air-photo.com/english_old/ra/deathbooks.html
8) They suggest a wiki with membership moderated.

In other words, they're stupid. Add that to "they're crackpots" and I
don't think they'll get anywhere.