On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 06:34:47PM +0100, Tony Sidaway wrote:
Chad Perrin said:
Just a thought: How about using CSS to show a block of color of the
size and dimensions of an image that might be deemed "inappropriate" by
popular standards of prudishness, with the ability to replace/cover
that block with the image itself by clicking on it?
Yes, this is very much along the lines I've been thinking. Give em their
figleaf. Figleafing should be configurable (on or off by default) and the
user should be able to set his preferences by cookie, without logging in.
Exactly. We seem to be on the same wavelength.
This thought has actually been forming in the back of my brain over the
course of the last three to five days without making itself consciously
available to me. Only today did it arise as a fully-formed thought
complete with the notion that, as a CSS solution, should admit a trivial
implementation.
I'm convinced that to be properly implemented, however, it must be
cookie-configurable by viewers not logged in from day one. Implementing
such that we overshoot our goals of accomodating users in the direction
of a pablumpedia would be a Bad Idea. Write the cookie code first, THEN
write the CSS.
--
Chad Perrin
[ CCD CopyWrite |
http://ccd.apotheon.org ]