Stan Shebs said:
I think it would be really helpful to the goal of
encyclopedia creation if it were possible for, say, the USGS to
assign one of their technical writers to the task of improving WP's
info on mountain ranges, or seafloor vents, or volcano prediction, plus
adding pictures that are not currently available on the net.
That kind of win can't happen if we don't come up with some way
to better accommodate organizational policies on sexual harassment.
So the situation is this. You think that USGS would be willing to assign
one of its technical writers to improve geometric data, but this chap is
unlikely to want to use Wikipedia in its current state because he might be
falsely accused, by person or persons unknown, of sexual harassment?
Curiouser and curiouser!
I'm afraid you'll have to sort that one out for yourself. Wikipedia
really shouldn't be involved in accommodating or condoning this kind of
corporate idiocy.