On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 11:50:01PM +0100, Tony Sidaway wrote:
We'd all lost the minute that unsupported statement was made by a person
who apparently believed he could get away with it.
Again: Where's the assumption of good faith? Where NPOV is "law" in
judging the content of Wikipedia, assumption of good faith applies in
judging the metadiscussion that occurs behind the scenes. I don't think
it is in any way necessary to assume he thought he "could get away with"
anything. Perhaps he just phrased something very poorly.
--
Chad Perrin
[ CCD CopyWrite |
http://ccd.apotheon.org ]