geni said:
Tony Sidaway said:
Kevin Rector said:
I've come to the realization that people
are searching out nude pictures to put in the 'pedia. They are looking
to stir up trouble, mostly to make a point.
I take this very seriously. What's your supporting evidence?
The suspicious speed they have been turning up since the clitorsis
incerdent. Not that I really care. Sonner or latter this will be
settled because everyone will be totaly fed up (the power of apathy to
settle dissputes)
Which clitoris incident are you referring to? According to evidence I
prepared for Arbcom for the Dr Zen case, there has been an inline
photograph on Clitoris ever since Anthere replaced the linked image by an
inline in May, 2004.
Could you give examples from the upload log? Something demonstrating that
there is a person or a number of persons uploading nude images in a way
that suggests that people are actually "searching out nude pictures to put
in the 'pedia?" I'd expect to see a pattern of certain people uploading
more than one such picture and trying to sneak it into an article in an
inappropriate way. Do we in fact have good evidence of this?
You mention a "suspicious speed"? What is your estimate for the rate at
which nude photographs are being uploaded to Wikipedia?