On 17 Sep 2004, at 21:26, Delirium wrote:
the slants are generally towards what you might
expect given the
sorts of people working on Wikipedia: rather strongly
pro-civil-liberties, moderately anti-US (but with proper caveats
usually mentioned), vaguely anti-religion, etc
ANTI-religion?!?!
ANTI-US !?!?!
Well, then I must have been dreaming when I removed all these "what
would Jesus say" - Christiospams from totally unrelated topics.
And the folks insinuating that the "Vietcong", not the U.S. had used
Napalm in Vietnam must have been entirely correct as well, I guess.
Yea, right.
- ropers