[WikiEN-l] Theresa Knott Vs. Mr. Natural Health

Tue May 25 07:55:44 UTC 2004

>From: N.T. Riche [mailto:vonriche at yahoo.com] 

>OK Theresa I'll use the Talk pages I do find some MNH's behavior "troubling" 
>(I'm avoiding personal attacks) as well as yours. Maybe you two should go the Arbitration.

Been there done that, MNH was banned for a month. I may well ask the AC to look into things again but I'd rather let them deal with irismeister first.

>Now for thing Lir's real name is Adam he's guy.

I know that. As I understand it, he prefers to be addressed as she. If that is not the case, then perhaps you could let us all know, because I am not the only one who thinks this.

>Also I do have a will of my own Michael chats with me a lot on aim and I don't listen to him. It's just Adam is a fellow socialist, and friend. 

I'm sorry if I seemed a bit curt. Of course you have free will, but you have got into a dispute that has been ongoing for months, and you don't know anything about it. MNH has told blatant lies about mediation with me, he has also told blatant lies about me harassing him, yet you choose to believe him. Adam came to iridology looking for a fight. Adam has driven several people away from wikipedia, and she tried her usual tactics on me. But it didn't work we me, and she didn't like. <shrugs shoulders> that's just tough I'm afraid. Irismeister is one of the rudest people I've ever met. He attacks loads of people with really low down nasty remarks. When people like fabiform can't take it anymore and decide to get out of iridology, her follows them to their talk page with his insults. When they delete him from their own talk page he posts their names on review of admin actions or on conflicts between users claiming they have no right to delete stuff. He also threatens people with lawsuits. Yet you choose to allow him into pressuring you to agree with MNH

You appear to me to have taken sides in this dispute. You posted that you have seen me attacking MNH on this mailing list without backing things up with links. You posted  "I have seen Ms. knott engage in Poving articles such as Iridology" in MNHs request for comments on me, and have still not posted links proving this despite being asked to by David Gerard two days ago.

So what's it to be? You have to choose.  Are you going to side with them or are you going to be neutral? If you want to act as a neutral go between between MNH and the "science people" I personally have no problem with that.But you have to stop taking sides, you have to not be pressured into doing things by anyone, and you have to back up signed posts on RFCs with links as evidence or else strike out your comment. Sometimes doing the right thing means upsetting people. That's just the way it is. 

Theresa