--- Anthere <anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Future :
Additionnaly, I think we could go forward setting a
couple of categories of potentially offensive
pictures, such as
* sex
* violence
* nudity
* ...
Let's not forget images of:
* Elections
* Demonstrations
* Medical procedures
* Diseases
* Weaponry/bombmaking
* Cracking (in the computer cracking sense)
* Drug paraphenalia
* Bioagents
* Chemical Agents
* Nuclear and Atomic Manufacturing / Processing Equipment
* Religious symbols
* American Presidents (it seems to really chafe some people to look
at GW)
* WWII-era paraphenalia (France/Germany especially)
I'm not being facetious, unfortunately. I see and read a lot of
non-US media (mostly really) and it's amazing the number of things
people find offensive.
Oh, forgot about animals too:
* Spiders
* large cats hunting and feeding
* Any insect up close
* Snakes
* slaugtherhouses
I am sure each culture is able to add to the list.
I just looked on the W for a page about that, but only came up with
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Profanity
Maybe there is a page for image classification based on
cultural/political sensitivities.
=====
Christopher Mahan
chris_mahan(a)yahoo.com
818.943.1850 cell
http://www.christophermahan.com/
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2'
http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=1808405861