8 votes is far too few, 18 or 24 might be more reasonable for what is likely
to turn into a ban of several weeks at best.
Fred
From: Jimmy Wales <jwales(a)bomis.com>
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 16:11:17 -0700
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Suggested implementation of Jimbo's quickpoll proposal
Delirium wrote:
I endorse
this as a proposed experiment. Should we proceed? Are there
any major objections to giving it a try for a few weeks?
We can monitor it and bail out of the experiment quickly if we find
that it's out of control. But it might help a lot.
I'm fine with it, though I think perhaps there should be more stringent
thresholds---a quick poll done with a handful of users and a moderate
threshold is fine for a 24-hour ban, but if it's going to be a longer
ban perhaps it should be a 2/3 or 3/4 threshold and some minimum number
of votes?
The proposal was for an 80% threshold and a minimum of 8 votes. So,
that's more stringent that what you mentioned already, right?
--Jimbo
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l