On Fri, 7 May 2004 18:38:04 -0400 (EDT), Theresa Robinson
<robinst(a)mit.edu> wrote:
Oh, sorry, I wasn't clear. I would be against
having a small permanent
group. By a small group what I meant is that if *any* three sysops agree
they can ban someone temporarily.
We've had some suggestions of this nature before (the "three strikes"
policy, for instance). I'd prefer to think of it as a "multilateral"
block (as opposed to the unilateral ones that always get unblocked).
That way if, say, three sysops got together and listed a user for
blocking, he could not be unblocked until three or more sysops got
together and listed him for unblocking.