[WikiEN-l] Wik and a not-quite-proposal for constitutional change

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Wik and a not-quite-proposal for constitutional change
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Wik and a not-quite-proposal for constitutional change
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Highly recommended. For example there is no reason there cannot be a Danzig
article and a Gdansk article, one dealing mostly with with Danzig as a
German city, the other with the modern Polish city. Likewise with cities and
villages which were formerly German, for example Hoffnungstal and Cebrikove,
the German and Ukrainian names for the village my family came from. The same
physical place, but a whole new group of people and a new culture.

This is, of course, the Wikinfo formula, but no reason Wikipedia can't adopt
it to reduce some conflict.

Fred

> From: "Martin Harper" <martin at myreddice.freeserve.co.uk>
> Reply-To: martin at myreddice.co.uk, English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
> Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 20:48:31 +0100
> To: wikien-l at Wikipedia.org
> Subject: [WikiEN-l] Wik and a not-quite-proposal for constitutional change
> 
> * Multiple independent versions of controversial articles

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Wik and a not-quite-proposal for constitutional change
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Wik and a not-quite-proposal for constitutional change
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]