[WikiEN-l] Wik's Vandal Bot?

Wed Jun 16 08:46:46 UTC 2004

I am trying to get an arbitration ruling on this as part of Wik2. Better
evidence that the vandal bot is actually Wik would be helpful.

Fred

> From: "KNOTT, T" <tknott at qcl.org.uk>
> Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 08:36:36 +0100
> To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
> Subject: RE: [WikiEN-l] [wik1234 at fastmail.fm: Quagga's vandalism]
> 
>> No he is not hard banned for life. He will, however, probably get a
> month >ban
>> the moment he comes back due to the fact that he broke the terms of his
>> week-long ban a few times. That is in the enforcement section of our
> (the >AC's)
>> ruling on the issue.
> 
> Violating a week long ban is one thing. Running a script to vandalize
> wikipedia repeatedly until we cave in for to his demands is something
> else. Assuming Jimbo posts the full header to confirm it wasn't faked,
> then I don't see we even need an AC ruling. This is simple vandalism. We
> block vandals all the time.
> 
> Theresa
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l