[WikiEN-l] Can we ban 172 now? And VV too! (in response to Fred Bauder)

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Can we ban 172 now? And VV too! (in response to Fred Bauder)
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Can we ban 172 now? And VV too! (in response to Fred Bauder)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Abe Sokolov wrote:

> "senile, 1950s era U.S. McCarthyite throwback"

Here is a typical example of 172's ad hominem that really ought to be
out of bounds, and yet quite a few people seem to be OK with it.
Why is anybody willing to put up with these kinds of low attacks?

Stan

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Can we ban 172 now? And VV too! (in response to Fred Bauder)
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Can we ban 172 now? And VV too! (in response to Fred Bauder)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]