Yes, it would be most use to articles that don't get
much attention, but then, I am guessing that ones that
do get more action get checked more. It's the ones
that noone ever sees that concern me most. The edit
history would show whether there were major changes
since a check. Can anyone who is more conversant with
how the categories (or another system) work suggest a
way to trial this that wouldn't annoy people?
--- Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com>
wrote:
Mark Richards wrote
I agree - is there any way that we could use
markers
or categories (maybe on the talk page) to
'certify'
that articles have been checked by someone for g
and
s?
There seems to be plenty of flexibility in the
category system for 'rating
usages'. The page history would show up edits
subsequent to any 'rating'.
Of course this is most useful on pages that are
rarely edited. Which will
in many cases be those that are _least_ read. I
don't know how practical it
would be to institute a drive to spread this all
over WP. The basic
categories are not propagating so very rapidly, IMX.
Charles
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo