[WikiEN-l] Should the content of articles be subject to arbitration?

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] FW: Decisions, Opinions, Precedents and Learning from Experience
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Should the content of articles be subject to arbitration?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>Whether we deal with article-based disputes is a close issue. While I see
>the need and advocate it, I recall great reluctance on the part of the
>mailing list to allow arbitration of article content. I'm also posting this
>to wikien-l for further comment by the mailing list.
>
>Fred

I feel very strongly that article disputes be settled by arbitration, or 
some other time consuming process where the issue is well thought over and 
researched, rather than decided by poll. To be honest, I have a rather 
contentious issue that I would like to have arbitrated, assuming it is still 
a concern by the time the arbitrators are ready to start taking cases (and 
also assuming it is decided that they will handle article disputes :) 
JackLynch

_________________________________________________________________
Find high-speed ‘net deals — comparison-shop your local providers here. 
https://broadband.msn.com

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] FW: Decisions, Opinions, Precedents and Learning from Experience
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Should the content of articles be subject to arbitration?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]