[WikiEN-l] Re: Arbitration progress report #2

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Arbitration progress report #2
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Another Type of Inadmissible Evidence
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Basically the same question as above; when are people "highly detrimental to 
> wikipedia"? The current policy, by my interpretation, states that someone is 
> highly detrimental to wikipedia if their personal attacks are extreme. Which 
> is obviously far from a clear-cut answer.

But the practice is that someone is highly detrimental to Wikipedia, 
when the sum of what he brings is lower that the sum of what he destroys.

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Arbitration progress report #2
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Another Type of Inadmissible Evidence
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]