I think no one should be short banned without a clear
process and global
agreement upon using this sort of action. Currently, we do not know who
could decide of such an action, and we do not have any arguments laid
down. Plus we confuse "short ban" as a mean to cool down the editor,
"short ban" as a mean to give a break to the group, and "short ban"
as a
way to get around due process.
Or "short ban" as a mean to publicly and wikipedia-globally humiliate
someone and declare that person to be "wrong"?
Short bans are a bad idea.
BL