Jimbo wrote (in part):
There are a few people (Anthere, TufKat, others?) who
I neglected to
include in my first list, but it is past the start of the year, and we
have a few outstanding controversies that need to be addressed.
Do you mean they weren't on the list but /are/ on one of the committees? Or
are they not yet appointed?
I'd like for a (relatively quick, as there's
work to be done now) vote
among each committee for a chairperson, who will be tasked with
organizing the work. I'd say that the chair should come up with a
plan of action, and propose some voting thresholds, and then with the
input and consensus of the wider community, I'll stamp my official
seal of approval on that.
Perhaps as a first step the committee members could indicate whether they
will be willing to take on that job? Or should we just go ahead and
nominate someone as chair?
Regards
sannse