On Tuesday 13 January 2004 03:09 pm, Poor, Edmund W
wrote:
There is a legitimate question about how much
human nudity should
be shown in Wikipedia.
In your opinion this is a legitimate question. I don't consider it legitimate
because I don't consider nudity offensive. (I have previously given the
example that if puritans consider exposure to nudity a bad thing for
children, they have to in the same vein consider a child looking at their own
unclothed body as harmful. That position is patently ridiculous.