Erik wrote:
Opponents of voting should note that this proposal does
advocate a very conservative stance on voting, including
an 80% threshold and use of voting only after consensus
has failed, and only on the basis of complete summaries of
past arguments. I hope that most opponents can agree to
such a compromise.
<mav raises hand>
Opponent of voting here.
</mav raises hand>
Since when have we started voting on a specific proposal without discussing
that specific proposal first? More is already on the linked talk page.
-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)