[WikiEN-l] When can an article be considered public domain?

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] When can an article be considered public domain?
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] When can an article be considered public domain?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Sorry it was meant to be a joke. Obviously not very funny. :(

Christiaan

On Aug 17, 2004, at 4:09 am, jcecropia at mail.com wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Christiaan Briggs <christiaan at yurkycross.co.uk>
> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:49:09 +0100
> To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] When can an article be considered public 
> domain?
>
>> On 14 Aug 2004, at 6:39 am, Jim Cecropia wrote:
>>
>>> First IANAL
>>
>> Would such jargon stand up in a court of law?
>>
>> Christiaan
>>
> In terms of what? I am not representing myself as a lawyer and thereby 
> stating that what I am saying may be knowledgeable, but it's not legal 
> advice, so take it FWIW. Anyone who went to court and said, "I did 
> this because a guy on the internet told me so" is not likely to do too 
> well anyway.
>
> Even if I WERE a lawyer, I would still have to say it is not legal 
> advice, because no lawyer-client relationship exists.
>
> IA-(still)-NAL, C

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] When can an article be considered public domain?
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] When can an article be considered public domain?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]