I object solely on the grounds that it is not the
arbcom's
responsibility to create policy.
Previously we ruled that Wik must not revert without giving a valid reason. In this case,
we may rule that certain admins must not block without giving a valid reason.
I am curious as to why people would object to the latter ruling on a matter of principle,
when I did not hear similar objections in the earlier case of Wik. Perhaps someone
could explain the difference to me?
Thanks
-Martin