I agree, and think that pages should be protected far
more easily than a user should be blocked. The
current rigid, tie-our-hands protection policy seems
to force people to think in terms of arbitration and
blocking, rather than protecting. This in turn makes
the arbitration commitees job harder, I think, wheras
the proactive settle it on the page approach seems
more wikifaithful.
S
--- Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com>
wrote:
Try sending an email, before taking an extreme step?
(Blocking for a story
simply about title changes and redirects _is_ an
extreme step; you allege
POV editing also. This may be annoying, but
blocking?)
Charles
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail