I suppose I should not have used the word "likely". It was just too
polite. :-)
Cunc could not possibly have unblocked something without it having been
blocked, but I'm sorry I keep forgetting that some people have
difficulties accepting logical conclusions as evidence :-P
Ec
Rick wrote:
"Likely"? So, in other words, you're
talking out of your hat, because
you have no evidence to support your contention.
RickK
Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
Andrew Lih wrote:
>Ray Saintonge wrote:
>Surely, whoever alleges that Cunc was abusing his sysop powers,
must
>recognize that Cunc's opponents were
equally guilty of such
misdeeds.
RickK and Maximus Rex have clearly listed what, when and where
Cunctator
did with his edits. Perhaps you could do the same
for the supposedly
"equally guilty" opponents.
Refer to the same articles. If Cunc abused sysop powers by unblocking
them, someone had likely abused Sysop powers by blocking it in the
first
place.
Ec