[WikiEN-l] William Connelley no longer neutral contributor (Re: toJimbo)

Mon Nov 24 22:28:27 UTC 2003

You're off-topic, the text in question relates to ozone depletion, not to
global warming.

Fred

> From: "Poor, Edmund W" <Edmund.W.Poor at abc.com>
> Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:50:16 -0500
> To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
> Subject: RE: [WikiEN-l] William Connelley no longer neutral contributor (Re:
> toJimbo)
> 
> Alan asks:
> 
>> Here the question is - does nearly every expert
>> in whatever field "global warming" falls under
>> (environmental science, or whatever) accept
>> William Connolley's claim? I don't know yet.
> 
> That's precisely the question we've been trying to answer, and the two
> points of view are:
> 
> * The Democratic Party of the US, along with the Clinton EPA and the
> UN's climate panel (IPCC) say that "nearly every expert" accepts the GW
> theory (which William also supports).
> * Others, like Bush (a politician); Lindzen and Balunias (scientists),
> Singer and Seitz (retired scientists) that that "less than half of all
> experts" accept the GW theory.
> 
> So there is a dispute over whether there is a consensus about a theory.
> Is that clear now?
> 
> Uncle Ed
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l