[WikiEN-l] William Connelley no longer neutral contributor (Re: toJimbo)

Mon Nov 24 22:15:00 UTC 2003

I would say the answer to that is no.  You could go to a library and look up
GW and you would find numerous books on either side of the argument.  You
could do the same thing with a search on Google or a similar site and the
results would be the same however, considering the nature of the internet,
you might not consider that ample proof one way or the other.  I think Ed's
suggestion of making Dr. Connelly a source would be the best way to handle
it.

[[User:T-Money]]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Allan Crossman" <a.crossman at blueyonder.co.uk>
To: <wikien-l at wikipedia.org>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 3:39 PM
Subject: [WikiEN-l] William Connelley no longer neutral contributor (Re:
toJimbo)

> Here the question is - does nearly every expert in whatever field
> "global warming" falls under (environmental science, or whatever)
> accept William Connolley's claim? I don't know yet.
>
>
> -- 
> Allan Crossman - http://dogma.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
> PGP keys - 0x06C4BCCA (new) || 0xCEC9FAE1 (compatible)