[WikiEN-l] Adolph

The Cunctator cunctator at kband.com
Fri Nov 14 18:45:50 UTC 2003


> From: Andre Engels
> "Jimmy Wales" <jwales at bomis.com> schrieb:
> 
> > Voting on the content of articles is not something that I think is
> > generally helpful, since it tends to lead to a lot of carping about
> > what the result of the vote actually means.
> >
> > Rather than voting one way or the other, a better approach is for
all
> > sides to work towards creatively accomodating the other people
working
> > on the article.
> 
> Which is a method that also doesn't work. People just talk and talk
and
> talk until one side decides they're tired of the whole thing and gives
up.
> 
> > In general, let's say the vote goes 80%/20% on some specific content
> > issue?  To me, that says that the 20% side has conclusively
> > demonstrated that the article is _not_ NPOV.  NPOV requires (near)
> > unanimity.
> 
> I think that's a ridiculous assumption. There can easily be near-
> infinitely many versions that are _all_ NPOV. And some prefer one,
others
> the other. There's more differences in opinion than just NPOV.
> 
Ah, the problems with the use of a poorly defined term of art to guide
policy.

Andre, you forget that Jimbo defined what "NPOV" means, so if he says
that NPOV requires (near) unanimity, it must be so.





More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list