Rick wrote:
Well, if people feel that there is a space for
Wikipedia in these
devotionals, and others that there is not, there is no middle ground,
and therefore what is there to discuss?
Well, for example, the discussion might clarify for you that no one is
advocating that _devotionals_ be included.
Why shouldn't they be in the encyclopedia?
Because they make
Wikipedia look bad. People look at these articles and say, "How can
they claim to be a serious encyclopedia when they have articles about
how someone is beloved by their dog?"
Is this a specific reference, or a straw man?
--Jimbo