Look, James, I know that it's fun slandering me,
but I would appreciate it
if you could stop for a second and actually read what I wrote. Thanks.
Yes I did read what you wrote and no I am not slandering you. I have a great
deal of respect for you but I think unilaterally rewriting a policy page
without a debate is grossly wrong. I am not always on wiki, neither are most
people. How are we to know if you have made a major change to a page if by
the time we come on your change has slipped from the Recent Changes list,
unless we go into every policy page and link it to our watchlist. A debate
can only happen if people know about it.
There are plenty of things on the policy pages that I believe are misguided
but I would not dream of going on and unilaterally changing them. I have
noticed a few changes to policy pages (not by you BTW). I always presumed
that they must have been debated and agreed first and that I had simply
missed the debate. Now you have me wondering if every change ''was''
debated
or if they were the unilateral work of some user that no-one noticed in
time, they know becoming a 'rule' by default.
JT.
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail