Adam von [name omitted for privacy reasons] wrote:
Yes, but try and remember that it is Jimbo who has the
problem with
me, not I who has the problem with Jimbo. There is naught that I can
to do to sway Jimbo, and in fact, this post here will almost certainly
serve to harden Jimbo against me, for he has consistently sent me
angry letters after any public statement in which I criticize him; he
will certainly find it critical for me to "put the blame on him" and
state that it is him who keeps me banned, not I (through my refusal to
atone for various grievances) who keeps me banned.
I have only complained to you privately when you have publicly lied
about the reasons that you were banned.
In any event, I'll gladly agree that you remain banned on my say-so,
as opposed to your own say-so. But the ban remains in place because
of your refusal to agree to some basic standards of behavior, and your
refusal to apologize for your past dishonest actions.
If you're willing now to do those things, and to genuinely reform your
behavior, then we can talk.
Also, I do believe I have stated that my name
isn't Adam on numerous
occasions.
Well, if you don't want people to call you Adam, Adam, then you should
reconfigure your software to reflect your name-of-choice. Right now,
emails from you appear to come from "Adam von [name omitted for privacy
reasons]".
--Jimbo