I have just been said I was abusing the list, because
sending two many mails and in double sometimes.
I wish to say that I sent many mails because I thought
I could answer to criticism (RK), to comments (Steve)
and to questions and request (Jimbo).
I sent double mails because I have pb with one of my
work computer configuration (the other one is the one
doing the wrong indentation someone mentionned). This
is not mine to be able to do anything, but the firm
admin. I have no right to install a new browser, nor
to reinstall the current one. Hence, either I stop
sending mail, or MB put the filter on my name as he
said he would do.
I thought that in an edit war, the ones involved in
the edit war were welcome to give their opinion once
the article was frozen, in the talk page. I was told
no to, to let others discuss the matter. Hence, I will
not comment any more. If anyone think I could help
them understanding the topic in any way, please drop
me a message. I am doubtful of how I could feel
entirely happy with the outcome if I have no voice at
all on the matter. I certainly did not want to say my
opinion would weight in any way in the final outcome,
but perhaps proper arguments would have been
receivable. But I will gladly let others than RK and I
work on the topic. I hope that before the final
decision is taken, I will be asked by Jimbo perhaps
what I think of the resulting proposal and if I have
anything else to say. I also hope I will be told when
I can come back on the topic. I still fail to see how
this could be called consensus if the ones in the edit
wars are asked to keep out of this consensus.
I also hope that RK does not go on insulting me on
this mailing list.
Thanks
Have a good day or week all.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com