Gutza wrote:
I think banning him would probably prove the point
that Wikipedia
isn't completely unregulated. But then again, it would probably also
prove that we're fascists to such a person. Not banning him would
prove him that Wikipedia is unreliable. Talking about him proves that
we're a bunch of losers who have nothing better to do. So I think
ignoring the guy would probably be the best thing to do, along with
keeping an eye on his IP and reverting his changes, should some more
occur in the future.
I want to talk to this guy.
His opinions of wikipedia aside -- does he really derive amusement from
causing damage to something other people have worked hard on?
I thought humans grew out of the "kicking sandcastles" phase in late
adolescence.
Anyway, this is something I'll maybe raise on MeatBall.
:)