[WikiEN-l] Controversial user nicknames
Richard Grevers
lists at dramatic.co.nz
Tue Aug 26 18:48:07 UTC 2003
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 22:46:25 -0700, Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net>
gave utterance to the following:
> james duffy wrote:
>
>> This might seem a small point now, as we don't have that many
>> controversial user nics. But as wiki grows the number of new users and
>> usernics will rocket. If two or three people use them and get away with
>> it, the likelihood is that more new members will follow, on the basis
>> that 'if he can call himself 'x', then I will call myself 'y'.' Sooner
>> or later we will face the problem. It makes sense to do it now, with
>> the small community, than try to deal with it when there are twice or
>> three times as many users, by which time offence may already have been
>> caused to some, and potential wikipedians frightened off by the
>> impression given by the unfortunate use of badly chosen names.
>>
>> Any observations?
>
> My observation on these names is that most of these users have an
> attention span that matches their social grace. Once [[User:Adolf
> Hitler]] has joined us, he is not likely to stay long. His usage of the
> name, however, means that all others are blocked from using that name
> in the future. The problem will effectively solve itself without the
> need for more rules.
>
Then why doesn't someone senior and responsible simply create all the user
names we think are offensive, effectively removing them from circulation.
Would this create a problem with user:talk pages?
--
Richard Grevers
Between two evils always pick the one you haven't tried
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list