Ec wrote
There are likely some who feel offended by it, but that is the personal
choice of the humourless.
It is not merely a case of having no sense of humour if you are someone of
Kurdish descent and you find a contributor editing an article on the Kurds
'humously' using the name of the man who committed genocide against the
Kurds. Nor is it a matter of a sense of humour if a contributor to an
article on the Jewish holocaust called himself after a leading nazi, with
the edit history listing a line of edits by Adolf Hitler. Or if someone as
a joke decided that all their edits to articles on child sex abuse use the
name of some notorious paedophile like Fr. Geoghan or Fr. Brendan Smyth.
A collegue of mine is named Moamer Qazafi -- which may not look
controversial at first glance, but it is simply another way to
transliterate the name of the Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi. Would
you ban him simply because his name has an unfortunate and not
particularly humorous similarity to that of a tyrant?