On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, J. Noel Chiappa wrote:
[snip]
First, some pages (e.g. Israel) will probably just
have to permanently be
protected. Well, maybe you need some sort of intermediate level of
protection; e.g. only editable by someone who a) has an account, b) has
it for a month, and c) has made a threshold level of accepted edits. But
allowing anyone, even someone who's not logged in, to edit them is just
going to turn into a constant edit war.
What's your opinion on some of the suggestions at
http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected_pages_considered_harmful ?
ie, a system whereby anyone can edit protected pages all they like, but
changes to the generally presented 'current' version are deferred until
the page is left to sit for a time. No limitation on _who's_ doing the
editing.
-- brion vibber (brion @
pobox.com)