Rotem Dan wrote:
OK, ok you guys don't seem to get the point of my
post. What I meant was that ANY philosophical text, is
inappropriate for an ENCYCLOPEDIA, because it's
obviously cannot become consensus, and will always
remain merely a POV.
It's on Larry's user page, right? We've always taken a *fairly* lax
view of what can be on user pages, and this seems to fall well within
our normal boundaries.
User pages are not _in_ the encyclopedia.
--Jimbo