[teampractices] Patch review culture of Wikimedia teams

Mon Mar 14 13:19:09 UTC 2016

Thanks everybody for the comments! However I'm still curious if this is
part of the TPG scope, hence I'd welcome a reply from TPG members.

Thanks,
andre

On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 14:16 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T101686 lists "Prioritization / weak
> open source culture: more pressure to write new code than to review
> patches contributed."
> 
> Apart from whether that statement is true or not:
> Does the Team Practices Group encourage regular Gerrit patch backlog
> grooming? If so, how, and is there any documentation available, or even
> data which teams perform better or worse? Is there any differentiation
> between "internal" patches by team members vs. contributed patches?
> Or is this out of scope for TPG?

-- 
Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/