[teampractices] MVP or MMP?

Mon Jun 15 16:23:50 UTC 2015

FWIW, in my (limited) experience, MVP is an industry term widely used, and
I haven't encountered MMP. There is something to be said for unified
industry lingo.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:14 AM, James Douglas <jdouglas at wikimedia.org>
wrote:

> Joking aside, I'm not too concerned with the overloadedness of terms we
> use, as long as we have consensus on what they mean.
>
> I'd be much more excited to define the thing that we're designating as
> MMP, i.e. "the bundle of features that satisfy user stories X, Y, and Z".
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:10 AM, James Douglas <jdouglas at wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Model View Presenter? :]
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Kevin Smith <ksmith at wikimedia.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Kind of a small issue, but I find myself leaning toward MMP (Minimum
>>> Marketable Product) rather than MVP (Minimum Viable Product). Although I
>>> prefer "viable", and MVP is catchy, it is also confusing and ambiguous,
>>> thanks to MVP (Most Valuable Player).
>>>
>>> Am I alone in preferring an acronym that isn't overloaded?
>>>
>>>
>>> Kevin Smith
>>> Agile Coach
>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in
>>> the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment. Help us make it a reality.*
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> teampractices mailing list
>>> teampractices at lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> teampractices mailing list
> teampractices at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/teampractices/attachments/20150615/c056ffce/attachment.html>