[teampractices] Bugzilla Etiquette draft [was: Re: Scrum-y tools based on BZ]

Wed Nov 27 17:39:57 UTC 2013

Thanks Andre, this is a good guideline and gives us something to point to
when someone is acting in bad faith.

*Jared Zimmerman * \\  Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia Foundation

M : +1 415 609 4043 |   :  @JaredZimmerman<https://twitter.com/JaredZimmerman>

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Steven Walling <swalling at wikimedia.org>wrote:

>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Andre Klapper <aklapper at wikimedia.org>wrote:
>
>> I've created a stub at
>> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bug_management/Bugzilla_Etiquette and
>> welcome comments on the Talk/Discussion page.
>>
>
> Thanks Andre! This seems pretty straightforward to me.
>
> One thing I boldly suggested a change to was the use of the phrase
> "respected project contributor". This is admirable because it includes
> staff and volunteers clearly, but it's also fairly vague. I changed the use
> of that term to suggest that only people who are maintainers of a component
> or contributors to that component should be messing around with bug
> resolution like WONTFIX. Does that seem okay?
>
> --
> Steven Walling,
> Product Manager
> https://wikimediafoundation.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> teampractices mailing list
> teampractices at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/teampractices/attachments/20131127/5382f492/attachment.html>