[Labs-l] replication lag

Mon Nov 23 13:01:52 UTC 2015

Ah, didn't see this, created a bug report:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119382

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:30 PM Yetkin Sakal <superyetkin at yahoo.com> wrote:

> That is good news for us all, jcrespo.
>
> Cheers!
>
>
>
> On Monday, November 23, 2015 2:00 PM, Jaime Crespo <jcrespo at wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
>
> It seems that 2 out of 3 labs replica servers had crashed, creating
> corruption in the process. Replica lag is now going down.
>
> Lag measuring (with 1 second resolution) is coming soon, will be available
> as a table, but I hit a bug and it is not being displayed correctly, so it
> is not yet public.
> I will announce it as soon as it is fixed.
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Yetkin Sakal <superyetkin at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> On Sunday, November 22, 2015 10:52 PM, John <phoenixoverride at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> I have http://tools.wmflabs.org/betacommand-dev/cgi-bin/replag which
> gives a rough estimate, plus we have
> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T119315
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Yetkin Sakal <superyetkin at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> Is there anywhere I can keep track of the status pertaining to the
> replication lag on s3? My tools are showing data from nearly a day ago.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Labs-l mailing list
> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Labs-l mailing list
> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jaime Crespo
> <http://wikimedia.org>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Labs-l mailing list
> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/labs-l/attachments/20151123/f80d3c77/attachment.html>