[Labs-l] Questions regarding the Labs Terms of use

Ricordisamoa ricordisamoa at openmailbox.org
Fri Mar 13 22:24:37 UTC 2015


Il 13/03/2015 19:38, Stephen LaPorte ha scritto:
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Ricordisamoa 
> <ricordisamoa at openmailbox.org <mailto:ricordisamoa at openmailbox.org>> 
> wrote:
>
>     What about tools and services made up of software themselves? Do
>     they have to be Open Source?
>
>
> Yes, all the software that we run on labs should be open source 
> (including tools). If there is a situation that justifies running 
> proprietary software, then we can discuss that with the Labs admins to 
> see if it's legal and appropriate. There is a strong preference to 
> avoid exceptions, as open source code will be easier to run and 
> maintain long term.
>
>     Strictly speaking, do the Terms of use require that all code be
>     made available to the public?
>
>
> It's not a strict requirement in the TOU that software is publicly 
> available. But non-public code may not be appropriate for a few 
> practical and policy reasons that Tim and Ryan explained well.

Thanks for your statement. Can you please have the wikitech.org page 
updated by an administrator?

>
> -- 
> Stephen LaPorte
> Legal Counsel
> Wikimedia Foundation
>
> /NOTICE: As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal and 
> ethical reasons, I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer 
> for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal 
> capacity. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer 
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer>./
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Labs-l mailing list
> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/labs-l/attachments/20150313/c3c0ce86/attachment.html>


More information about the Labs-l mailing list