[Labs-l] 2-factor shell auth (was:second attempt to request alternative login server)

• Previous message: [Labs-l] 2-factor shell auth (was:second attempt to request alternative login server)
• Next message: [Labs-l] 2-factor shell auth (was:second attempt to request alternative login server)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

who is calling this password auth thread? It's about alternative
logins to bastion and this thread is actually called 2-factor shell
auth.

I am just as annoyed by your lack of willingness to fix problems or
even discuss them just as you are annoyed by me suggesting to use
passwords. I never said that the passwords are the only option - it's
just one of many options - and this is problem and we should fix it
somehow.

Creating bastion2 and 3 was actually a good step.

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Jeremy Baron <jeremy at tuxmachine.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Petr Bena <benapetr at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Really? When it happened and why there was no announcement? I am using
>> labs almost since they exist and it was impossible to send e-mails
>> from beginning... How they managed to do that?
>
> It was announced.
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/labs-l/2013-February/000915.html
>
> This will be my last mail on a password auth thread. Please drop it. I
> don't want to have to stick you in a killfile. :(
>
> -Jeremy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Labs-l mailing list
> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l

• Previous message: [Labs-l] 2-factor shell auth (was:second attempt to request alternative login server)
• Next message: [Labs-l] 2-factor shell auth (was:second attempt to request alternative login server)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]