[Foundation-l] Term of service?

Mon May 22 18:22:17 UTC 2006

Nothing wrong with it. For one thing, inactive administrators would  
be purged, as well as those who simply don't work out. On English,  
they can only be removed if they are nasty enough that they end up in  
arbitration, and that is very nasty indeed.

Fred

On May 22, 2006, at 9:21 AM, THD wrote:

> Hi, Friends,
> There are some people proposing a policy for administrator's term  
> of service
> in Chinese Wikipedia. In the proposing policy, when the term of  
> service is
> over, administrators shall get their administrative power through a
> re-election. I want to know that is there any Wikimedia project  
> with this
> kind of policy? In my own opinion, this is quite weird. I want to  
> know what
> will other language editions do when facing this kind of proposal.  
> Thanks.
> THD
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>