[Foundation-l] RfC: A Free Content and Expression Definition

Tue May 2 17:53:31 UTC 2006

--- Andre Engels <andreengels at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2006/5/2, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com>:
> 
> > Show me a case where we can get an ND license, but
> the prospect of
> > getting a free license are zero,  show me cases
> where accepting an ND
> > license wouldn't hurt our ability to obtain a free
> license.
> 
> I already mentioned one: The text of the GNU/FDL and
> the GPL are
> themselves under an ND license.
> 

I agree this is a good example.  Most all the cases I
have seen are not any of a release under CC-by-ND, but
more in the line of a notice stating "the copyright
holder permits distribution of this document without
modifications so long as this notice remains intact." 
Wikisource does not often deal with documents from
places which are involved with the "free culture"
movement.  So we have next to nothing that is released
under Creative Commons or GFDL besides the work of our
editors.  But I will try to compile a list of conrete
works that this disscussion involves soon. 

Birgitte SB

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 