[Commons-l] Re: Trademarks
Alphax
alphasigmax at gmail.com
Thu Sep 15 10:35:50 UTC 2005
Claus Färber wrote:
> Jimmy Wales <jwales at wikia.com> schrieb/wrote:
>
>>The core goal of Commons is maximal reuse.
>
>
> Maximal reuse might result in minial content.
>
> I think every restriction should be evaluated to determine whether the
> image is still "free enough".
>
> With copyright, that's quite easy: Copyright restricts nearly every act
> of redistribution, so it makes sense to require that images and other
> media need to have a "free license".[1]
>
> On the other hand, trademarks only restricts labelling products with the
> image or impersonating the owner, i.e. "trademarkish" use. IMO(!),
> that's still "free enough".
>
> Further, there's a conflict if you include "trademarkish" use within the
> maximal reuse goal of Wikimedia: If someone really starts to use an
> image on Commons as a trademark, it's likely to become protected as a
> trademark (and incompatible with the maximal reuse goal).
>
> Finally, there are some practical problems with a strict no-trademark
> policy. As everything can be trademarked, you would have to do regular
> trademark searches with every trademark registry. You can't ask the
> author/source of an image (especially if it's PD or depicts something
> found in nature) and there are very few things that can't be trademarked
> (and virtually none the upload of which to Commons makes sense).
>
>
Agreed. This makes perfect sense to me.
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
More information about the Commons-l
mailing list