Well,

as I have just seen the list of volunteers, I would recomend to start withing the existing community which can support you and than fork it if necessary. The best en.wv, which is multigenrational. Wikiversity Beta has a very low number of contributors.


Regards,
Juandev



2012/11/11 Juan de Vojníkov <juandevojnikov@gmail.com>
Well,

it could go to Wikiversity. Wikiversity is also about research, not only education. Recently I was kicked from Wikibooks, where I left a primary research textbook, so I came back to Wikiversity. That is like GLAM bulletin, which is on outreach wiki, not at its own special wiki.

There is also the other way to have a special wiki for the journal, but if there are not many contributors its better to start on existing project and than if needed move it outside.

Think also about Wikiversity Beta, which is suppose to be our multilingual hub and incubator.


Regards,
Juandev


2012/11/9 Joe Corneli <holtzermann17@gmail.com>
Dear Wikiversity-ans:

There has been some considerable discussion in wiki-research-l about
creating a new Wiki Studies journal and/or a new place to do research
the wiki way.

One question is, why do we need a new place to do research, couldn't
we just use Wikiversity for that?  For now, Wikiversity seems to focus
on education and specifically-educational research, but might it make
sense to broaden the scope to include original research more
generally?

If you could have a look at the skeleton of the proposal here and add
your input (or via this thread), I would appreciate it!

  http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Research_Ideas/Research_Hub

Thanks,
Joe

_______________________________________________
Wikiversity-l mailing list
Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l