New subject: Wikitext-l Digest, Vol 36, Issue 6

18 Sep 2013

Hi Subbu,
  I have another two question:
1. According to the roadmap, you will research the “HTML-only wiki support”
and “DOM-based templating”. Does it mean that if you launch these
functions, wikitext will no longer be supported, even the round-trip
doesn’t work?
2. In “MediaWiki_DOM_spec” there are a lot of discussing and implemented
status. Will the parsoid output change a lot in the future?  What is the
approximate percentage?

Thanks
Feng Yi

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:00 PM, &lt;wikitext-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt;wrote;wrote:

...
  Send Wikitext-l mailing list submissions to
         wikitext-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
         https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitext-l
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
         wikitext-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org

 You can reach the person managing the list at
         wikitext-l-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than "Re: Contents of Wikitext-l digest..."

 Today's Topics:

    1. Re: Diff between real Parsoid result and Introduction page
       (Subramanya Sastry)

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

 Message: 1
 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:13:59 -0700
 From: Subramanya Sastry &lt;ssastry(a)wikimedia.org&gt;
 To: wikitext-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
 Subject: Re: [Wikitext-l] Diff between real Parsoid result and
         Introduction page
 Message-ID: &lt;522F7D87.2010905(a)wikimedia.org&gt;
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"

 On 09/10/2013 02:18 AM, Feng Yi wrote:
  Hi,
   I'm in google wiki knowledge team and currently work on Parsoid.
   I found there are some diffs between
 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Parsoid/MediaWiki_DOM_spec and real
 Parsoid output.
   For example: /RFC 1945 /
 in page:
 <arel="mw:ExtLink/PMID"
     resource="http://purl.org/commons/html/pmid/20610307"
     href="//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20610307?dopt=Abstract  < 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20610307?dopt=Abstract>"
      about="#_:PMID-20610307-1234"
     class="external mw-magiclink-pmid">
    PMID 20610307
 </a>
 in Parsoid:
 *<a typeof="mw:ExtLink/RFC" href="//tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1945
 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1945>" rel="mw:ExtLink/RFC">RFC
 1945</a></p>*
 /
 /
    I have removed the "parsoid-data" and other global tags, but still
 a lot of diff.
    The page is updated several days ago, so is the released Parsoid
  not newest?
  Hi Feng,

 The spec for RFC is this:

 <a  rel="mw:ExtLink/RFC"
     href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1945"
     resource="urn:ietf:rfc:1945"
     about="#_RFC-1945-1234"
     class="external mw-magiclink-rfc">
    RFC 1945
 </a>

 and output after discarding data-parsoid is:

 <a  rel="mw:ExtLink/RFC"
     href="//tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1945"
     typeof="mw:ExtLink/RFC">
    RFC 1945
 </a>

 So, there are diffs, yes.  We are in the process of cleaning up our spec
 (and actively making a few changes) -- in some cases, the spec is
 outdated, and in other cases, the spec has information about proposed
 changes (but not yet implemented).  In the next week or so, we'll try to
 clean up our spec (removing/updating outdated information, or adding
 annotations where the spec is proposing changes).

 Thanks for alerting us about the mismatch.

 Subbu.

Re: [Wikitext-l] Wikitext-l Digest, Vol 36, Issue 6