"Jay R. Ashworth" <jra(a)baylink.com> wrote in
message news:20061120155809.GC19372@cgi.jachomes.com...
On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 03:43:58PM -0000, Mark
Clements wrote:
> Why not use .info - surely that is what the domain is for?
>
> .wiki is certainly a bad idea as it tells me nothing about the content
or
purpose of the
site.
Strictly speaking, .info and .net (other common approaches to that)
don't do that either. :-)
Well, they do have an intended meaning, even if that isn't stuck too. I
admit that without enforcing the meaning of the TLD then it becomes pretty
useless as a descriptor. If all information sites (and only information
sites) had .info domains then that would surely be a good thing. I guess
the problem is that until the golden ideal of a ".com address" is removed
from people's minds then any other TLD is always a less-than-ideal second
choice. :-(
I rather like .wiki, actually.
I'd quite like .clements, then my website could be
www.mark.clements -
doesn't mean it's a good idea.
I wish they'd just get the hell out of the way,
put some business and
technical restraints in place, and open the TLD namespace.
In other words, remove the TLD namespace altogether.
- Mark Clements (HappyDog)