On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
What's broken about it? It seems very odd to me
that the mean is an
order of magnitude greater than the 95th percentile, but otherwise it
all looks fine. I suspect there are a few invalid data points messing
with the mean - perhaps pending changes is being turned off on
articles while there are unreviewed edits and they are counting as
being unreviewed for ages? (Or perhaps only if PC is turned back on
again for that article and they are eventually reviewed days after
being made.)
If that is the problem, then I would suggest disallowing turning off
PC on an article with revisions still pending. Alternatively, turning
off PC could automatically approve any pending changes.
Reviewing the logs I am unable to find even a single article with a
wait anywhere near that.
Can you find one?
By day two or so it was showing an average of several days during some
hours. Some people speculated that in cases where no edits had been
made since PC was activated it was simply taking the time between the
prior two versions or something like that.