Hallo, First, you might want to consider the difference between an actual usecase and a so-called "example". The "Click-Here-Case" was a latter one. Secondly, although I fundamentally follow the belief that the editor dictating the user's browser's behaviour is a Bad Thing[tm], this way of thinking of course rules out a bunch of considerable exceptions which might pop up and be good reasons for opening new windows. By some bizarre conincidence, this is the case here. Always keep in mind that especially in wiki context "user" (content receiver) and "editor" (content provider) are not separatable. Especially in closed user groups. Especially in an intranet. So: For me as administrator of this intranet wiki, every other day users/editors/colleagues line up at my desk, my phone and my inbox asking how to open links in an external window. Get it? The users want it. The editors want it. The reason for these wishes is irrelevant. And in this very moment the answer to their request "It isn't available because of a online community religious war saying 'what you want is defined bad so you don't get it'" is no longer justified. One might want to think over these basics of the usual religious war regarding this question. Bye Philipp